Apart from "Ace Ventura" and his role as the Riddler in "Batman
Forever", I've always found Jim Carrey to be a bit hit or miss. I
certainly never rated him as much of a serious actor and so got a nice
surprise with "The Number 23". He was great! In fact, it was all a
very welcome change from the usual nastiness I watch and I wasn't bored
for a moment. I've never been good at working out "whodunnits" and I
was so sure about who I thought had committed the murder that I got
quite a surprise at the end. A lot of people have said that the
ending was predictable. Well, I didn't find it so. I don't think you
could possibly work out the ending in this case before it happens. "The
Number 23" wasn't without its flaws though. There were a few places
where scenes didn't entirely work. Perhaps the flashbacks to Jim Carrey
pretending that he was younger were the worst of these since he looks
his age. I also found some of the editing to be a bit odd in spite
of some really good camera effects. It had the feel of "Sin City" about
it at times. I can't quite put my finger on it but it just didn't gel
with the "Donnie Darko" quality of the rest. The acting was good
throughout though. I didn't recognise Virginia Madsen at all and was
amazed to see Rhona Mitra. I'd forgotten all about her after she lost
out on the "Tomb Raider" role. The script certainly had me thinking
too. I didn't know all that stuff about "23" before and so I may have
to look into it some more now. Anyway, I recommend this film to
anyone who wants to see a better version of a similar story to "The
Dark Half" or "Secret Window".
(1 comment(s) published)
kush said .......
I thought this movie had great potential until the end. I would have liked to have seen Jim Carey's character return to his psychotic murderous nature at the end of the movie. I thought the ending was very corny and lacked creativity. Oct 24, 2007, 8:05 am